Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 6;19(4):752–762. doi: 10.1007/s12350-012-9539-4

Table 4.

Relation between planar and SPECT indices

Correlations Mean values for clinical populations
PCC P value ICD NDD RCT P value
Early
 Planar HM 1.53 ± 0.3 1.44 ± 0.3 1.71 ± 0.2 .024
 SPECT HM 0.795 <.001 1.95 ± 0.5 1.70 ± 0.8 2.52 ± 0.3 .001
 SPECT MM 0.771 <.001 0.91 ± 0.3 0.73 ± 0.5 1.20 ± 0.2 .006
 SPECT ML 0.578 <.001 0.87 ± 0.2 0.69 ± 0.3 0.93 ± 0.2 .011
Delayed
 Planar HM 1.40 ± 0.2 1.38 ± 0.4 1.75 ± 0.2 <.001
 SPECT HM 0.851 <.001 1.69 ± 0.6 1.63 ± 1.1 2.54 ± 0.3 <.001
 SPECT MM 0.842 <.001 0.79 ± 0.3 0.71 ± 0.5 1.22 ± 0.2 .001
 SPECT ML 0.497 <.001 0.85 ± 0.2 0.74 ± 0.3 0.92 ± 0.2 .139
Washout
 Planar HM 0.49 ± 0.38 0.48 ± 0.35 0.15 ± 0.13 <.001
 SPECT HM 0.706 <.001 0.41 ± 0.65 0.97 ± 1.32 0.04 ± 0.32 .002
 SPECT MM 0.359 .010 −0.71 ± 2.47 0.10 ± 0.56 1.38 ± 4.30 .044
 SPECT ML −0.145 .315 0.18 ± 2.06 −0.65 ± 1.90 1.56 ± 2.40 .163

HM, Heart-to-mediastinum ratio; MM, myocardial wall-to-mediastinum ratio; ML, myocardial wall-to-lumen ratio.

Pearson correlation analysis or Spearman’s rank correlation between the planar and the SPECT for uptake and washout indices.

Anova or Kruskal-Wallis analysis to determine the difference between the mean values.