Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 12.
Published in final edited form as: Stroke. 2011 Jul;42(7):2068–2070. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.110.611434

Table 2.

Percent reduction in HRSD score from baseline to end of treatment by genotype

SERT Genotype Randomization group Number of participants N (%) in remission Mean % reduction in HDRS Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean T (df) P-value (two tailed)
5-HTTLPR
l/l Intervention 10 1 (10%) −32.27 22.59 7.14 − .622 (19) 0.54
Control 11 1 (9%) −25.70 25.46 7.68
s/l Intervention 12 5 (42%) −47.06 23.85 6.89 −2.53 (20) 0.02
Control 10 2 (20%) −15.90 33.88 10.71
s/s Intervention 8 7 (85%) −62.78 11.18 3.95 −3.8 (16) 0.002
Control 10 3 (30%) −27.20 24.32 7.69
STin2 VNTR
10/10 Intervention 5 1 (20%) −22.49 30.20 13.51 −0.88 (4) 0.43
Control 1 0 (0%) 6.67 . .
9/10 or 10/12 Intervention 11 3 (27%) −44.99 10.49 3.16 −2.2 (21) 0.37
Control 12 2 (16%) −26.85 25.11 7.25
9/12 or 12/12 Intervention 14 9 (64%) −55.87 23.19 6.19 −3.5 (30) 0.001
Control 18 4 (22%) −22.12 29.59 6.97

Note: For each SERT polymorphism (5-HTTLPR and STin2 VNTR) the number of participants in intervention and control groups are shown. The middle columns give the number and percentage of these subjects in remission after 9 weeks (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, HDRS, score of <10 as a surrogate for remission), the mean % reduction in their HDRS scores over the same time span, as well as standard deviation and standard error of the mean HDRS change over time. Results of the statistical analysis are shown to the right (df = degrees of freedom).