Table 3. Comparison of Screening Model 5 With Multiple Predictor Screening Models for Three Outcomes.
| PPV >.50 | Sensitivity >.50 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||
| Outcome and predictor | R2 | Δ | Sensitivity | Specificity | Sensitivity | Specificity |
| Parent–teacher fifth grade externalizing (20%) | ||||||
| Model 5 (teacher & parent first grade externalizing) | .32 | 0 | .64 | .88 | .52 | .95 |
| Model 5 plus Bennett et al. (1999) variablesa | .33 | 11 | .62 | .88 | .50 | .93 |
| Self-reported delinquency (22%) | ||||||
| Model 5 | .23 | 5 | .60 | .86 | .50 | .90 |
| Model 5 plus Bennett et al. (1999) variables | .31 | 0 | .58 | .86 | .50 | .90 |
| DISC externalizing diagnosis (18%) | ||||||
| Model 5 | .18 | 4 | .41 | .89 | .51 | .86 |
| Model 5 plus Bennett et al. (1999) variables | .23 | 0 | .53 | .89 | .51 | .91 |
Note. Test values in bold surpass preset criteria. Models with a delta greater than 4 are notably inferior to the best model (Δ = 0); models with a delta greater than 10 fail to explain a substantial amount of variation in the model. PPV = positive predictive value. DISC = Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children.
a
The variables were socioeconomic status; maternal education, maternal depression, parenting practices, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and parent satisfaction.