Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 3;96(2):289–295. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.028266

TABLE 3.

Quartiles of prepregnancy dietary pattern adherence scores and GDM risk1

Q12 Q2 Q3 Q4 P-trend
aMED
 GDM/pregnancies 221/4601 321/7366 147/4134 183/5275
 Model 1 1.0 0.87 (0.73, 1.03)3 0.66 (0.53, 0.82) 0.61 (0.49, 0.75) <0.0001
 Model 2 1.0 0.89 (0.74, 1.06) 0.70 (0.57, 0.88) 0.67 (0.54, 0.84) 0.0001
 Model 3 1.0 0.95 (0.79, 1.14) 0.76 (0.60, 0.95) 0.76 (0.60, 0.95) 0.004
DASH
 GDM/pregnancies 232/4213 220/5573 227/5806 193/5784
 Model 1 1.0 0.69 (0.57, 0.83) 0.66 (0.54, 0.79) 0.52 (0.42, 0.64) <0.0001
 Model 2 1.0 0.75 (0.61, 0.90) 0.74 (0.61, 0.90) 0.61 (0.49, 0.76) <0.0001
 Model 3 1.0 0.77 (0.63, 0.93) 0.78 (0.64, 0.95)  0.66 (0.53, 0.82) 0.0005
aHEI
 GDM/pregnancies 242/4661 252/5261 203/5313 175/6141
 Model 1 1.0 0.86 (0.72, 1.04) 0.64 (0.53, 0.79) 0.44 (0.36, 0.54) <0.0001
 Model 2 1.0 0.90 (0.74, 1.08) 0.67 (0.55, 0.81) 0.46 (0.37, 0.57) <0.0001
 Model 3 1.0 0.96 (0.79, 1.15) 0.75 (0.61, 0.91) 0.54 (0.43, 0.68) <0.0001
1

Model 1: adjusted for age (mo), total energy intake (kcal/d; quintiles). Model 2: adjusted as for model 1 plus gravidity (0, 1, 2, 3, and ≥4), smoking status (never, former, or current), physical activity (in MET-h/wk; quartiles), sedentary time (hours sitting at home/wk: 0–1, 2–5, 6–10, 11–20, or ≥21), parental history of type 2 diabetes (yes or no), and, for the DASH analysis only, alcohol (g/d: 0, 1–14, or ≥15). Model 3: adjusted as for model 2 plus prepregnancy BMI (in kg/m2; categorical <23, 24–25, 26–27, 28–30, 31–34, or ≥35). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate RRs and 95% CIs; chi-square test for P-trend. Higher scores indicate greater pattern adherence. aHEI, alternate Healthy Eating Index; aMED, alternate Mediterranean Diet; DASH, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; MET-h, metabolic equivalent of task-hours; Q, quartile.

2

Reference.

3

RR; 95% CI in parentheses (all such values).