Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 27;39(7):4386–4394. doi: 10.1118/1.4729740

Table 1.

Comparison between film and FFDM for 12 textural features.

  Film value FFDM value    
Features (std. dev.) (std. dev.) Corr. coeff. p-value
DFAV 21.88 (4.431) 21.69 (4.458) 0.9190 1.0000
DFVR 329.2 (123.7) 321.0 (126.3) 0.9602 1.0000
DFEN 5.809 (0.3456) 5.797 (0.3486) 0.9057 1.0000
SMAV 256.8 (3.648) 256.8 (3.063) 0.8338 0.8238
SMVR 1706 (257.2) 1731 (216.5) 0.8773 1.0000
SMEN 7.320 (0.1115) 7.335 (0.0930) 0.8568 0.5034
INVD 0.0487 (0.0149) 0.0494 (0.0127) 0.8801 0.5034
ENER 0.0003 (0.0001) 0.0003 (0.0001) 0.8910 0.5034
ENTR 12.04 (0.2924) 12.05 (0.2857) 0.9008 0.5034
COR 0.3790 (0.2357) 0.4035 (0.2364) 0.9435 0.2632
ICO1 0.1743 (.0264) 0.1753 (0.0235) 0.8303 0.8238
ICO2 0.9468 (.0186) 0.9480 (0.0158) 0.8534 0.8238