Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Carbohydr Res. 2012 May 18;357:147–150. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2012.05.008

Table 1.

Comparison of reaction yields of allylglycoside formation using varying procedures or conditions

Entry Glycosyl Donor
(conc.: 0.128M
in CH2Cl2)
Lewis
Acid
(2 equiv.)
Allyl
Alcohol
[equiv.]
Reacetylation Peracetylated
allyl glycosidea
Yield
(isolated)
1 7 BF3·Et2O 1.1 yes 11 ( : = 1:12) 20%
2 7 TMSOTf 4 no 11 ( : = 1:6) 20%
3 7 TMSOTf 4 yes 11 ( : = 1:13) 68%
4 8 BF3·Et2O 1.1 yes 12 ( : = 1:12) 36%
5 8 BF3·Et2O 4 no 12 ( : = 1:10) 22%
6 8 BF3·Et2O 4 yes 12 ( : = 1:12) 61%
7 9 BF3·Et2O 1.1 yes 13 ( : = 1:25) 39%
8 9 BF3·Et2O 4 no 13 ( only) 24%
9 9 BF3·Et2O 4 yes 13 ( : = 1:2) 76%
10 10 BF3·Et2O 1.1 no 14 ( : = 1:3) 22%
11 10 BF3·Et2O 4 no 14 ( only) 18%
12 10 BF3·Et2O 4 yes 14 ( : = 1:3) 70%
a

The ratio of and anomers was determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy.