Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Epidemiol. 2012 Jun 1;22(8):568–574. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2012.04.020

Table 4.

Multivariable model predicting incident lower-body functional limitations.

Characteristic Adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval)
Census tract street connectivity quartile
 1 (lowest connectivity) vs. 4 (highest connectivity) 3.45 (1.21; 9.78)
 2 vs. 4 (highest connectivity) 1.97 (0.69; 5.59)
 3 vs. 4 (highest connectivity) 1.85 (0.61; 5.65)
One lower body limitation: Yes vs. No 2.80 (1.69; 4.66)
Block face conditions
 2–3 conditions vs. 0–1 conditions rated as fair-poor 3.18 (1.49; 6.82)
 4–5 conditions vs. 0–1 conditions rated as fair-poor 3.52 (1.67; 7.43)
Health insurance at or 12 months before interview: No vs. Yes 2.07 (1.10; 1.50)
Self-perceived health status: Fair/poor vs. Good/very good/excellent health 2.07 (1.16; 3.72)
CES-D >=9 of 11: Yes vs. No 1.39 (0.71; 2.73)
No. of severe chronic conditions (per condition) 1.49 (1.15; 1.92)
Body Mass Index
 >=30.0 vs. <25.0 2.78 (1.47; 5.27)
 25.0 – 29.9 vs. <25.0 1.23 (0.69; 2.22)
Sitting index - YPAS (per point) 1.37 (1.07; 1.76)