Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 10;27(4):595–607. doi: 10.1093/her/cyr062

Table III.

Results of the process evaluation of Qaderoon

Dose delivered
Activities reported to be implemented as planned, extent reaching 76 to 100%, N (%) Summer Fall
Facilitatora 124 (91.2) 135 (79.4)
Observera 27 (81.8) 43 (71.7)
Objectives reported to be achieved as planned, extent reaching 76 to 100%, N (%) Summer Fall
Facilitatora 122 (93.1) 136 (79.5)
Observerb 36 (76.6) 48 (65.8)
Dose received
Percent of sessions rated as “positive and active”, N (%) Summer Fall
Mentor 1a 113 (85.6) 121 (76.1)
Mentor 2a 100 (81.3) 102 (79.1)
Facilitatora 102 (72.9) 133 (78.7)
Observerb 27 (77.1) 50 (66.7)
Average active participation rate (%)c Summer Fall
Mentorsa 89.9 86.4
Fidelity
Activities fully implemented, N (%) Overalld Summer Fall
Facilitatora 242 (78.3) 115 (83.9) 127 (73.8)
Observerb 106 (80.9) 47 (87.0) 59 (76.6)
At least one activity not implemented, N (%) Overalld Summer Fall
Facilitatora 56 (18.1) 20 (14.6) 36 (20.9)
Observerb 18 (13.7) 6 (11.1) 12 (15.6)
More than one activity not implemented, N (%) Overalld Summer Fall
Facilitatora 11 (3.6) 2 (1.5) 9 (5.2)
Observerb 7 (5.3) 1 (1.9) 6 (7.8)
Reache
Attendance N (%)
Overall groups & sessions Did not attend any session <50 % of sessions 50-69% of sessions 70-89% of sessions ≥ 90% of sessions
20 (6.7) 166 (55.5) 60 (20.1) 46 (15.4) 7 (2.3)
a

N summer = 144, N fall = 187; total number of evaluations completed by the facilitators and mentors in the summer and fall respectively.

b

N summer = 54, N fall = 75; total number of evaluations completed by the observers in summer and fall respectively.

c

% of average active participation: Average of active students as rated by the two evaluating mentors over all the points of observation (groups and sessions).

d

Overall sessions and groups, throughout the intervention: summer and fall.

e

N=299 (Total number of youth assigned to intervention).