Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011 Jan 11;115(3):229–236. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.11.010

Table 2.

Fixed and Random effects for 3-level model partitioning variability in adherence and competence.

Fixed Effects Random Effects

Intercept β00 Residual Within
Therapist τb00
Between
Therapist τc00
Within
Therapist %
Between Therapist
%

Fundamental MET
Adherence (n=190) 4.34*** 0.75 0.12** 0.10** 0.14 0.12
Competence (n=194) 4.83*** 0.44 0.15*** 0.01 0.25 0.02
Advanced MET
Adherence (n=192) 2.58*** 0.57 0.02 0.08*** 0.03 0.13
Competence (n=188) 4.72*** 0.34 0.04* 0.06*** 0.11 0.17
MET Inconsistent Strategies
Adherence (n-192) 1.71*** 0.47 0.05 0.22*** 0.09 0.32
Competence (n=108) 4.36*** 0.29 0.07* 0.01 0.19 0.03

Note. The sample sizes mostly varied because competence is not rated if items comprising competence scores did not occur. The sample sizes ranged from a minimum of 108 for advanced MET competence and a maximum of 194;

*

<.05;

**

<.01;

***

<.001.

Within therapist % denotes the percentage of variability in a given outcome at the client level or within therapists. Between therapist % denotes the percentage of variability in a given outcome at the therapist level or between therapists.