Table 1.
Ligand | NP formulation | NP hydrodynami c size |
NP zeta potential |
Model | BBB integrity confirmation |
Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Myristoylated polyarginine peptide |
Cross-linked dextran coated superparamagnetic iron oxide (CLIO) |
40 nm | Not reported |
Intracranial implant of U-87 MG cells into mice |
Intracranial implant of U-87 MG cells into mice |
[87] |
Chlorotoxin | Chitosan-g-PEG coated iron oxide NPs |
33 nm | 4.2 mV | Transgenic model of medulloblastom a |
Brain tumor uptake compared to control NPs. Gd-DTPA used to confirm BBB integrity. |
[96] |
RI7217 (rat anti-mouse CD71 clone) |
Liposome of EPC, cholesterol, EPG, and MPB-PE |
116 nm | −14.8 mV |
Balb/c mice | Brain uptake compared to control and other ligandcoupled liposomes |
[89] |
Lactoferrin | DMSA modified superparamagnetic iron oxide NPs |
74.8 nm | −11.1 mV |
Intracranial implant of C6 cells into rats |
Brain tumor uptake compared to control NPs |
[94] |
Leptin30 | Dendrigraft poly-l- lysine: DNA complexes |
141 nm | 1.15 mV | Nude mice | Permeability across BCEC monolayer assessed in vitro. Brain uptake compared to control NPs. |
[277] |
p- aminophenyl- α-D-manno- pyranoside |
Daunorubicin loaded, Tf modified liposomes |
122.8 nm | −6.37 mV |
Intracranial implant of C6 cells into rats |
Permeability across BMVEC monolayer assessed in vitro. Brain tumor uptake compared to control NPs. |
[278] |
OX26 monoclonal antibody |
Chitosan-g-PEG NPs |
636.69 nm | 18.23 mV |
Swiss albino mice |
Brain uptake compared to control NPs. |
[279] |
OX26 monoclonal antibody |
6-coumarin or NC- 1900 loaded PEG- PCL polymersomes |
100 nm | −21.3 mV |
Sprague– Dawley rats |
Brain uptake compared to control NPs and NPs with varying amounts of OX26. |
[280] |
TAT | FITC or QD loaded cholesterol- terminated poly(ethylene glycol) NPs |
190 nm | 22 mV | Sprague– Dawley rats |
Brain uptake compared to free FITC or QD |
[281] |
Cationic albumin |
PEG-PLA NPs | 82.1 nm | −12.19 mV |
In vitro only | Permeability across BCEC |
[282] |