Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010 Jul 19;53(5):1307–1320. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0016)

Table 7.

Frequency counts and rates of overtmarking: Elicitation probe.

Variable SLI AM LM Total
Am
   Standard marked 72 70 73 215
   Nonstandard marked 2 0 15 17
   Dialect appropriate 2 0 14 16
   Dialect inappropriate 0 0 1 1
   Nonstandard zero marked 26 30 13 69
   No response 0 0 0 0
   % marking M (SD) 74 (40) 70 (48) 87 (25) 77 (38)
Is
   Standard marked 38 69 57 164
   Nonstandard marked 11 1 22 34
   Dialect appropriate 0 0 0 0
   Dialect inappropriate 11 1 22 34
   Nonstandard zero marked 51 30 21 102
   No response 0 0 0 0
   % marking M (SD) 49 (44) 70 (48) 79 (35) 66 (43)
Are
   Standard marked 31 59 60 150
   Nonstandard marked 15 11 29 55
   Dialect appropriate 14 11 26 51
   Dialect inappropriate 1 0 3 4
   Nonstandard zero marked 54 30 10 94
   No response 0 0 0 0
   % marking M (SD) 44 (48) 70 (48) 90 (28) 68 (45)
Collapsed BE
   % marking M (SD) 57 (39) 70 (48) 85 (24) 71 (39)