Table 4. Comparison between 3′IVT microarray with FDR<0.05 and exon array gene expression fold change levels using ArrayTrack platform.

Comparison groups	No. of differentially expressedgenes in exon array	No. of differentially expressedgenes in 3′IVT array	No. of common genes in 3′IVTarray versus exon array
Dysplasia vs Transgenic	933	1536	238 (15.49%)
Dysplasia vs Non-transgenic	1677	2147	730 (34.00%)
Tumor vs Transgenic	4319	1628	1050 (66.50%)
Tumor vs Non-transgenic	4436	2363	1512 (63.99%)

Number of common genes found when same platform of ArrayTrack software used for comparison between 3′IVT and exon array. For 3′IVT array differential gene expression fold change obtained with parameters as false detection rate (FDR) <0.05, fold change of ≥2, mean channel intensity (MCI) of 100, bad flag of 5. For exon array differential gene expression fold change obtained with parameters as false detection rate (FDR) of <0.05, mean channel intensity (MCI) of 100, bad flag of 4. In the () are % of genes found common in exon array from 3′IVT array.