Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 16;7(7):e40273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040273

Table 6. Comparisons of Bayley III scores after adjusting for confounders among 4 dioxin groups.

Percentile of PCDDs/Fs-TEQ (pg/gfat) <25 25–50 50–75 ≥75
Gender Domain Mean SE Mean SE p Mean SE p Mean SE p
Boys N 30 37 28 25
Cognitive Total cs 93.0 2.3 95.2 2.0 95.1 2.3 87.2 2.6 b,c
Language Total cs 96.1 1.2 98.4 1.0 96.7 1.2 94.0 1.3 b
Reseptive com ss 8.4 0.3 9.1 0.2 a 8.5 0.3 8.4 0.3
Expressive com ss 10.2 0.2 10.3 0.2 10.3 0.2 9.5 0.2 a,b,c
Motor Total cs 101.1 2.0 102.4 1.7 101.1 2.0 96.9 2.2
Fine motor ss 8.8 0.3 9.3 0.3 8.6 0.3 7.9 0.4 b
Gross motor ss 11.4 0.5 11.4 0.4 11.7 0.5 11.0 0.5
Girls N 22 15 24 28
Cognitive Total cs 95.0 3.0 100.2 3.3 93.8 2.6 91.1 2.5 b
Language Total cs 98.3 1.7 97.0 1.8 95.7 1.4 95.3 1.4
Reseptive com ss 8.9 0.4 8.5 0.4 8.4 0.3 8.4 0.3
Expressive com ss 10.5 0.3 10.5 0.3 10.2 0.3 10.0 0.3
Motor Total cs 105.0 2.6 106.6 2.8 101.6 2.3 101.6 2.2
Fine motor ss 9.9 0.5 10.2 0.5 9.2 0.4 9.0 0.4
Gross motor ss 11.7 0.5 11.9 0.5 11.2 0.4 11.5 0.4

a: p<0.05 as compared with <25 percentile group, b: p<0.05 as compared with 25–50 percentile group, c: p<0.05 as compared with 50–75 percentile group.

N: number of subjects, Mean: adjusted mean, SE: standard error, p: p-value.

cs: composite score, ss: scale score, com: communication.

Confounders: parity (primipara or not), maternal age, weight, educational period (years), alcohol drinking during pregnancy (yes/no), family income, family smoking (yes/no), gestational weeks, infant age (days) on the day of each examination, and location difference (TK or ST hospital).

Note: Bayley III test could not be performed for 1 girl.