Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 27.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Res. 2012 May 28;1467:27–41. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.05.045

Table 1.

Global summary of reprocessed Letter and Shape results: the p-levels were determined from a permutation test of 1,000 iterations. The percentage of the variance accounted for (%VAF) was computed with respect to the raw data, i.e. prior to any application of a design matrix and prior to the removal of any taskindependent effects. ‘PC set’ indicates which Principal Components were used to construct the load-related patterns. One can appreciate the general relationship between PC-set and variance accounted for: the more PCs were used, the lower the variance accounted for.

Task
phase
Ordinal
Trend?
p-level %VAF PC
set
Letter task
STIM Yes <0.001 2.5 1-7
RET Yes 0.001 6.2 1-3
PROBE Yes <0.001 2.2 1-8
Shape task
STIM Yes 0.001 4.2 1-6
RET Yes 0.006 5.5 1-4
PROBE No N/A N/A N/A