Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Behav Immun. 2012 May 26;26(6):988–995. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2012.05.011

Table 5.

Group effects1 on primary outcomes (natural log-transformed).

Baseline (Visit 1) Change, Visit 1 to 5 Difference in Change versus Placebo 95% CI P-value2
log(TNF-α)
 Placebo 0.66 (0.25) 0.11 (0.030)
 1.25 g/d n-3 0.74 (0.25) 0.002 (0.028) −0.11 (0.04) −0.028 to −0.19 0.03
 2.5 g/d n-3 0.71 (0.25) −0.024 (0.029) −0.13 (0.04) −0.052 to −0.22 0.004
log(IL-6)
 Placebo 0.91 (0.60) 0.31 (0.077)
 1.25 g/d n-3 1.02 (0.60) −0.106 (0.070) −0.41 (0.10) −0.21 to −0.62 0.0003
 2.5 g/d n-3 0.85 (0.60) −0.123 (0.074) −0.43 (0.11) −0.22 to −0.64 0.0002
CES-D, log
 Placebo 1.5 (0.17) −0.056 (0.15)
 1.25 g/d n-3 1.5 (0.17) −0.29 (0.15) −0.23 (0.21) −0.64 to 0.18 0.80
 2.5 g/d n-3 1.6 (0.17) −0.26 (0.15) −0.20 (0.21) −0.61 to 0.21 1.00
1

Least squares means (SE) adjusted for gender. Cytokine models additionally adjusted for sagittal abdominal diameter.

2

Comparison to placebo, Bonferroni-adjusted within outcome to account for multiple testing. Tests are t-tests with degrees of freedom ranging from 451 to 530. There were no significant differences between supplement doses.