Table 4.
wd | w+ | w− | wd | w+ | w− | wd | w+ | w− |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
0 | 1 | 0 | ||||||
1 | 1 | 0 | ||||||
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||
(a) | (b) | (c) |
(a) As in Table 2 (n = 100), which results in a LUT as expected. Weights are either potentiated or depressed through the entire table. (b) n = 60, which is too low, because the discrete weights and are projecting exclusively to themselves. (c) n = 350, which is too large, because for w+ the discrete weight 0 is mapped right to (and for w- the weight 1 is mapped to 0), thus is never reached.