Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Langmuir. 2012 Apr 18;28(17):7063–7070. doi: 10.1021/la300566x

Table 1.

Electron-Transfer Rate Constants of NB–DNA (kNB–DNA) and MB′–DNA (kMB′–DNA) as Single-Stranded DNA (ssDNA) and Double-Stranded DNA (dsDNA) under Different Running Conditions

ssDNAc dsDNAc (0 mM MgCl2) dsDNAc (100 mM MgCl2)



log(kMB′–DNA/s−1)a log(kNB–DNA/s−1)a log(kMB′–DNA/s−1)a log(kNB–DNA/s−1)a log(kMB′–DNA/s−1)a log(kNB–DNA/s−1)a
spermidine bufferb 1.6 1.6 0.5 and 1.6e 0.3 0.5 0.6
low salt bufferb 1.2 1.6 −0.2 and 1.6e N/Ad 0.4 N/Ad
a

The electron transfer rates were determined by applying Laviron analysis to CV data acquired at scan rates ranging from 50 mV/s to 13 V/s. The uncertainties are ~10% of the log(k) values.45

b

Low salt buffer is 5.0 mM phosphate, 50 mM NaCl, and pH 7. Spermidine buffer is 5.0 mM phosphate, 50 mM NaCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 4 mM spermidine, 50 µM EDTA, 10% glycerol, and pH 7.

c

Assembled overnight with 25 µM of ssDNA (probe strand lacking thiol complement) or dsDNA, with or without 100 mM MgCl2.

d

The rate for double-stranded NB–DNA could not be determined in low salt buffer as the signals were too small.

e

Two distinct reductive peaks were observed for MB′–DNA when assembled without MgCl2 (Figure 7).