Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Maturitas. 2011 Nov 15;71(1):55–61. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.10.010

Table 4.

Linear regression models for the unadjusted and adjusted association of LH/FSH ratio > 2 with obesity, metabolic disturbances and chronic inflammation

Mean (SEM) LH/FSH ratio > 2
Model I: Unadjusted Model II: Adjusted
Beta (SEM) P Beta (SEM) P
Body mass indexa: 29.1 (0.3) −1.5 (0.9) 0.089 −1.4 (0.9) 0.14
Waist Circumferencea: 95.7 (0.8) −3.1 (3.4) 0.36 −2.5 (3.5) 0.50
Triglyceridesb: 157.6 (13.6) 6.8 (18.3) 0.71 7.8 (24.9) 0.76
HDL cholesterolb: 56.8 (1.9) 0.8 (3.9) 0.84 −2.5 (4.6) 0.59
Systolic blood pressurea: 126.0 (0.9) −2.4 (3.6) 0.50 2.9 (3.3) 0.39
Diastolic blood pressurea: 75.5 (0.5) 0.9 (3.0) 0.75 −0.2 (2.9) 0.95
Glucoseb: 96.3 (1.8) −8.8 (1.9) 0.001 −7.9 (2.6) 0.009
HOMA-IRb: 3.0 (0.3) −0.9 (0.8) 0.28 −0.7 (0.8) 0.43
CRPa: 0.6 (0.03) 0.3 (0.2) 0.26 0.3 (0.2) 0.23
a

Weighted linear regression analyses based on 4-year MEC weights for 1999–2002 NHANES data. Adjusted regression models include age (in years) and hysterectomy as covariates.

b

Weighted linear regression analyses based on 4-year fasting sample weights for 1999–2002 NHANES data. Adjusted regression models include age (in years) and hysterectomy as covariates.