Table 1.
Reports with self-expandable metallic stent placement
| Authors | Cases | Technical success | Clinical success | Method | Stent used | Early complications | Late complications |
| Giovannini[20] | 2 | 100% | 100% | CDS 1 | 10 F PS 1 | --- | --- |
| HGS 1 | 10 F PS and PCSEMS 1 | ||||||
| Burmester et al[8] | 4 | 75% (1 failure) | 100% | CDS 1 | 8.5 F PS | --- | --- |
| HGS 1 | |||||||
| HJS 1 | |||||||
| Mallery et al[9] | 2 | 100% | 100% | RTPS 2 | USEMS | --- | --- |
| Püspök et al[13] | 6 | 83% (1 failure) | 80% (1 failure) | CDS 4 | 7-10 F PS: 4 | Cholecistitis 1 | --- |
| HJS+R 1 | 7 F PS + USEMS: 1 | ||||||
| Ang et al[18] | 2 | 100% | 100% | CDS 2 | 7 F PS | Pneumoperitoneum 1 | --- |
| Fujita et al[19] | 1 | 100% | 100% | CDS 1 | 7 F PS | --- | --- |
| Bories et al[20] | 11 | 91% (1 failure) | 80% | HGS 11 | 7-10 F PS 7 | PS: 1 ileus and 2 occlusion | SEMS: 1 migration and 2 occlusion due to tissue ingrowth |
| PCSEMS 3 | SEMS: 1 biloma and 1 cholangitis due to stent shortening | ||||||
| Will et al[17] | 8 | 90% (1 failure) | 88.9% (1 failure) | HES 1 | 8.5 F PS 3 | Slight pain 2 | Cholangitis 1 |
| HGS 4 | PCSEMS 2 | ||||||
| HJS 1 | USEMS 2 | ||||||
| RTPS 1 | |||||||
| Itoi et al[25] | 4 | 100% | 100% | CDS 4 | 7 F PS 3 | Peritonitis and bleeding 1 | Occlusion 1 |
| 5 F NBD 1 | |||||||
| Tarantino et al[23] | 8 | 100% | 100% | CDS 4 | 10 F PS | --- | --- |
| RTPS 4 | |||||||
| Yamao et al[24] | 5 | 100% | 100% | CDS 5 | 7-8.5 F PS | Pneumoperitoneum 1 | Migration 1 |
| Occlusion 5 | |||||||
| Kahaleh and Maranki et al[10,12,16,29] | 49 | 84% (8 failure) | 98% | TPSA 32 | 10 F PS | Pneumoperitoneum 4 | Occlusion 1 |
| SIAS 1 | USEMS | Bleeding 1 | |||||
| HGS 4 | Biliary peritonitis 1 | ||||||
| CDS 4 | Abdominal pain 1 | ||||||
| Aspiration pneumonia 1 | |||||||
| Hanada et al[27] | 4 | 100% | 100% | CDS 4 | 6-7 F PS | --- | --- |
| Brauer et al | 12 | 92% (1 failure) | 72% | CDS 4 | 10 F PS 5 | Duodenal perforation 1 | --- |
| RTPS 7 | USEMS 6 | Respiratory failure 1 | |||||
| Park et al[28] | 14 | 100% | 100% | CDS 5 | FCSEMS | Pneumoperitoneum 2 | Migration 1 |
| HGS 9 | |||||||
| Lai et al[32] | 1 | 100% | 100% | CDS 1 | 10 F PS | ---- | ---- |
| Martins et al[33] | 1 | 100% | 100% | HGS | PCSEMS | ---- | Migration 1 (dead) |
| Park et al[34] | 5 | 100% | 100% | HGS | FCSEMS | --- | --- |
| Nguyen-Tang et al[35] | 5 | 100% | 100% | TPSA | USEMS | --- | --- |
| Kim et al[26] | 15 | 80% (3 failure) | 100% | RTPS | USEMS 8 | --- | --- |
| 10 F PS 4 | |||||||
| Belletrutti et al[36] | 1 | 100% | 100% | CDS | FCSEMS | --- | --- |
| Iwamuro et al[37] | 7 | 100% | 72% | CDS | 10 F PS | Peritonitis 2 | Occlusion 2 |
| Eum et al[34] | 3 | 100% | 100% | CDS 2 | FCSEMS | --- | --- |
| HGS 1 | |||||||
| Artifon et al[38] | 3 | 100% | 100% | CDS | PCSEMS | --- | --- |
| Artifon et al[39] | 1 | 100% | 100% | CA | PCSEMS | --- | --- |
| Siddiqui et al[40] | 8 | 100% | 88% | CDS | FCSEMS | Duodenal perforation 1 | --- |
| Fabbri et al[31] | 16 | 75% (4 failure) | 100% | CDS 9 | PCSEMS | Pneumoperitoneum 1 | --- |
SEMS: Self-expandable metallic stent.