Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Care. 2012 Jun 12;24(9):1087–1091. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2012.690507

Table 3.

Logistic regressions predicting disclosure of sexual orientation

Overall Model −2 log L
Wald’s χ2
Intercept only Intercept and covariates
Disclosure to the mother 291.30 270.01 26.76d
Disclosure to the father 156.61 126.74 21.79c
Disclosure to the closest friend 341.72 282.44 46.58d

Parameters of the models Odds ratio Parameter Estimate Wald’s χ2 95% CI

Disclosure to the mother (N = 245)
 Intercept −6.08 19.36d
 U.S. acculturation 1.94 0.66 7.09b 1.19 – 3.15
 Gender non-conformity 0.41 0.44 7.41b 1.28 – 4.61
 Comfort with sexual orientation 1.82 0.60 7.49b 1.18 – 2.79
 Gay-related discrimination 0.69 −0.37 2.47 0.43 – 1.10
 Satisfaction with social support 1.66 0.51 5.33a 1.08 – 2.56
Disclosure to the father (N = 183)
 Intercept −10.79 21.39d
 U.S. acculturation 2.26 0.82 5.24a 1.12 – 4.55
 Gender non-conformity 0.32 0.58 5.59a 0.12 – 0.82
 Comfort with sexual orientation 2.21 0.79 3.68a 0.98 – 4.97
 Satisfaction with social support 2.90 1.07 9.27b 1.46 – 5.76
Disclosure to the closest friend (N = 300)
 Intercept −4.76 17.25d
 U.S. acculturation 1.57 0.45 3.35+ 0.97 – 2.54
 Gay community involvement 2.23 0.80 17.50d 1.53 – 3.25
 Satisfaction with social support 1.58 0.46 4.44a 1.03 – 2.43
 Closest Friend (CF)
 ◆CF: heterosexual male vs. female 0.31 −1.09 11.59c 0.11 – 0.87
 ◆CF: gay male vs. female 2.45 0.99 20.57d 1.24 – 4.85
+

p < .1,

a

p < .05,

b

p < .01,

c

p < .001,

d

p < .0001