Table 3. Morphological comparison of two representative isolates from Indonesia, South Africa, Thailand, and Uruguay. Ten measurements were taken of each structure and the (minimum-) average minus standard deviation – average plus standard deviation and (-maximum) given below.

Characteristic / Country	Indonesia	South Africa	Thailand	Uruguay
Ascomatal bases
Shape	Globose	Globose	Globose	Globose
Length	(125−)162–199(−200)	(120−)142–190(−202)	(188−)190–197(−200)	(144−)170–197(−200)
Width	(143−)173–193(−200)	(132−)143–193(−216)	(154−)177–199(−212)	(141−)164–184(−197)
Ascomatal necks
Length	(390−)400–450(−470)	(372−)392–460(−486)	(354−)370–400(−424)	(354−)368–386(−409)
Width (bases)	(24−)25–35(−40)	(24−)25–35(−42)	(24−)25–35(−39)	(23−)26–32(−38)
Width (apices)	(15−)16–18(−20)	(15−)16–20(−22)	(16−)17–19(−20)	(15−)16–22(−25)
Ostiolar hyphae
Shape	Divergent	Divergent	Divergent	Divergent
Length	(36−)43–53(−63)	(39−)40–52(−62)	(33−)35–39(−41)	(38−)41–51(−53)
Ascospores
Length	3–5	3–5	3–4	3–4
Width (excluding sheath)	4–6	4–6	4–6	4–6
Width (including sheath)	5–8	5–7(−8)	5–7	6–7
Primary phialides
Length	(69−)70–100(−134)	(73−)76–114(−131)	(67−)76–96(−100)	(73−)75–83(−88)
Width (bases)	4–6	4–6	4–6	2–4
Width (broadest point)	4–6	4–6	6–8	4–5
Width (apices)	3–5	3–5	3–5	3–4
Secondary phialides
Length	(60−)70–100(−143)	(64−)69–109(−143)	(63−)68–77(−99)	(69−)72–96(−109)
Width (bases)	3–6	3–6	5–6	3–6
Width (apices)	5–7	5–7	4–8	6–8
Primary conidia
Length	(13−)19–20(−24)	(15−)18–24(−25)	(10−)13–17(−18)	(10−)11–15(−18)
Width	4–5	4–5	3–4	2–3
Secondary conidia
Length	6–8	6–8	6–8	(7−)9–11
Width	5–8	5–7	5–8	6–8
Chlamydospores
Shape	Globose/Subglobose	Globose/Subglobose	Globose/Subglobose	Globose/Subglobose
Length	10–15	10–13	12–15	(6−)7–11(−13)
Width	8–13	8–10	10–13	(5−)7–11(−12)