Skip to main content
. 2012 May;2(5):1056–1064. doi: 10.1002/ece3.224

Table 1.

General linear mixed model results for larval performance measures. Despite a significant difference between the two experiments, the influence of our intended experimental treatments ranged from 4× to 40× stronger (based on F-statistics) than that of temporal replication.

Source Variable type DF Adjusted sum of squares Adjusted mean squares F P
Average larval period
Treatment Fixed  3 597,440 199,147 333.5 <0.001
Experiment Random  1 97,4936 97,4936  8.3 <0.005
Error 167 99,731 597,597
Total 171
Survivorship to pupation
Treatment Fixed  3 85,126 28,375 31.5 <0.001
Experiment Random  1 97,6837 97,6837  7.6 <0.006
Error 221 597,901 597,901
Total 225
Average female pupal mass
Treatment Fixed  3 0.4592 0.1531 53.4 <0.001
Experiment Random  1 0.0384 0.0384 13.4 <0.001
Error 154 0.4413 0.0029
Total 158