Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 8;2012:406568. doi: 10.1155/2012/406568

Table 3.

Radiologic outcomes broken down by EBT, 3DRT, and IMRT groups with statistical comparison. EBT: endorectal brachytherapy; 3DRT: 3D conformal radiotherapy; IMRT: intensity-modulated radiotherapy; RT: radiotherapy; CR: complete response; PR: partial response; SD: stable disease; PD: progressive disease; LN: lymph nodes.

Radiologic outcome EBT (n = 7) 3DRT (n = 10) IMRT (n = 7) P
Post-RT tumor volume (median (range) cm3) 1.0 (0.0–3.6) 3.8 (0.7–26.3) 0.4 (0.0–5.5) 0.16
Time between RT end and post-RT MRI (mean ± SD days) 35 ± 3 35 ± 7 36 ± 9 0.98
% decrease in tumor volume pre-RT → post-RT (median (range)) 89 (38–100) 87 (16–96) 93 (66–100) 0.78
No. CR (%) 1 (14) 0 (0) 1 (14) 0.46
No. PR (%) 4 (57) 9 (90) 6 (86) 0.23
No. SD (%) 2 (29) 1 (10) 0 (0) 0.26
No. PD (%) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1.0
No. with clinically significant mesorectal LN before treatment (%) → no. after treatment (%) 1 (14) → 0 (0) 6 (43) → 3 (21) 1 (14) → 1 (14)
No. with clinically significant pelvic LN before treatment (%) → no. after treatment (%) 0 (0) → 0 (0) 4 (29) → 4 (29) 1 (14) → 0 (0)

Medians and ranges are given to better represent the data, but statistical comparison was performed among means.