Table 1.
Latent constructs | Factor loading (second order) |
Indictors | Factor loading (first order) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Social capital (depth) | Parent–child relation quality | .498 | Global relationship quality (2) | .728 |
Support from parents (6) | .768 | |||
Positive involvement (12) | .788 | |||
Romantic relation quality | .682 | DAS dyadic satisfaction (10) | .772 | |
DAS dyadic consensus (13) | .702 | |||
DAS dyadic cohesion (5) | .563 | |||
DAS affection expression (4) | .526 | |||
Friendship quality | .386 | Get along with friend (1) | .525 | |
Friend would help (1) | .706 | |||
Could tell problem (1) | .761 | |||
Feel happy with friend (1) | .700 |
Note. Indicators of parent–child relationships include an equal number of items that refer to mothers and fathers. The number of items that compromise each indicator is shown in parentheses. DAS = Dyadic Adjustment Scale. All factor loadings were significant. Model fit χ2 (41, N = 585) = 100.30, CFI = .95, RMSEA = .05.