Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 18.
Published in final edited form as: Evid Based Child Health. 2011 Sep 8;6(5):1322–1339. doi: 10.1002/ebch.827

Table II.

Eczema (all ages and risk levels)

Comparison Number of
participants
(trials)
Risk ratio
(95%
confidence
interval)
I2
(%)
Exclusive breastfeeding for at least six months versus
introduction of solids at three to six months
3731 (2) 0.75 (0.42, 1.32) 61
Hydrolysed formula versus cow’s milk formula
(prolonged feeding)
1478 (8) 0.87 (0.70, 1.08) 0
Extensively hydrolysed formula versus cow’s milk
formula (prolonged feeding)
912 (3) 0.84 (0.58, 1.23) 19
Partially hydrolysed formula versus cow’s milk
formula (prolonged feeding)
823 (7) 0.92 (0.72, 1.17) 0
Extensively hydrolysed formula versus partially
hydrolysed formula (prolonged feeding)
1061 (4) 0.88 (0.73, 1.05) 0
Hydrolysed formula versus human milk (early short-
term feeding)
09 (1) 0.48 (0.05, 4.41) --
Hydrolysed formula versus cow’s milk formula (early
short-term feeding)
77 (1) 0.34 (0.04, 3.15) --
Soy formula versus cow’s milk formula 744 (3) 1.23 (0.99, 1.53) 0
Maternal antigen avoidance versus standard diet 360 (3) 0.95 (0.63, 1.44) 21
Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation versus placebo 664 (3) 1.10 (0.78, 1.54) 45
Omega-6 fatty acid supplementation versus placebo 259 (2) 0.80 (0.56, 1.16) 0
Prebiotic versus no prebiotic 432 (2) 0.79 (0.21, 2.94) 80
Prebiotic versus other prebiotic * 150 (1) 0.22 (0.07, 0.76) a --
Probiotic versus no probiotic# 1492 (6) 0.85 (0.66, 1.08) 46
a

Significantly favours prebiotic (polydextrose, galacto-oligosaccharide and lactulose).

*

Polydextrose, galacto-oligosaccharide and lactulose versus polydextrose and galacto-oligosaccharide.

#

This review also reported data on a subgroup of participants with atopic eczema; 1354 participants in four trials contributed to this outcome, and the effect estimate was not significant (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.51, 1.42; I2: 65%).

Bold text indicates statistical significance.