Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 18;7(7):e40670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040670

Table 4. Community level results of multilevel logistic model for the outcome of modern contraceptive use, community gender norms and inequalities domain.

Region and Country Community gender norms & inequalities
Mean communityviolence justificationindex score Mean community decision-making autonomyscore Women in thecommunity withat least aprimary education Men in the community withat least a primary education Ratio of men to women employed in the community
Eastern Africa
Ethiopia (2005) 0.91 (0.79, 1.06) 1.11 (0.89, 1.38) 1.95 (0.90, 4.23) 0.93 (0.45, 1.89) 1.01 (0.99, 1.03)
Kenya (2008–09) 0.80 (0.71, 0.91) 1.09 (0.91, 1.30) 1.25 (0.45, 3.50) 0.86 (0.24, 3.04) 0.94 (0.89, 1.00)
Madagascar (2008–09) 0.98 (0.84, 1.15) 1.23 (1.05, 1.43) 0.82 (0.42, 1.59) 1.05 (0.52, 2.13) 0.96 (0.69, 1.33)
Rwanda (2005) 1.22 (0.99, 1.51) 1.21 (0.98, 1.49) 2.39 (0.98, 5.82) 1.08 (0.45, 2.56) 1.01 (0.94, 1.09)
Uganda (2006) 0.91 (0.79, 1.05) 0.98 (0.78, 1.22) 2.05 (0.87, 4.80) 2.01 (0.56, 7.27) 1.05 (0.82, 1.33)
Zambia (2007) 0.70 (0.62, 0.78) 1.05 (0.85, 1.30) 1.42 (0.53, 3.81) 0.43 (0.13, 1.43) 1.05 (1.01, 1.10)
Zimbabwe (2005–06) 1.16 (1.01, 1.33) 0.97 (0.82, 1.14) 0.76 (0.21, 2.80) 5.12 (1.05, 25.01) 1.00 (0.97, 1.02)
Middle Africa
Congo (2005) 1.00 (0.79, 1.28) ** 4.04 (0.86, 19.01) 0.27 (0.03, 2.78) 1.06 (0.86, 1.31)
Democratic Republicof Congo (2007) 1.03 (0.84, 1.27) 0.98 (0.71, 1.35) 0.78 (0.22, 2.83) 0.49 (0.07, 3.37) 0.96 (0.85, 1.08)
Northern Africa
Egypt (2008) 0.88 (0.82, 0.95) 0.95 (0.86, 1.06) 1.20 (0.82, 1.75) 0.58 (0.38, 0.87) 1.01 (1.01, 1.02)
Southern Africa
Namibia (2006–07) 0.98 (0.87, 1.10) 1.01 (0.90, 1.15) 2.25 (1.15, 4.40) 0.75 (0.43, 1.32) 1.04 (0.99, 1.08)
Swaziland (2006–07) 1.00 (0.75, 1.33) 0.98 (0.79, 1.22) 0.79 (0.31, 2.02) 0.59 (0.25, 1.40) 1.01 (0.95, 1.06)
Western Africa
Benin (2006) 1.08 (0.96, 1.21) 1.07 (0.91, 1.24) 0.69 (0.31, 1.55) 1.07 (0.58, 1.98) 1.18 (0.80, 1.75)
Ghana (2008) 0.99 (0.81, 1.20) 1.07 (0.86, 1.33) 0.98 (0.43, 2.22) 0.53 (0.22, 1.24) 0.88 (0.58, 1.35)
Guinea (2005) 1.03 (0.80, 1.34) 1.01 (0.73, 1.40) 0.71 (0.14, 3.59) 0.88 (0.25, 3.08) 1.04 (0.62, 1.74)
Liberia (2007) 1.14 (0.97, 1.34) 1.05 (0.82, 1.35) 0.83 (0.32, 2.16) 0.75 (0.27, 2.07) 1.10 (1.04, 1.17)
Mali (2006) 0.98 (0.87, 1.10) 1.09 (0.91, 1.31) 1.54 (0.62, 3.82) 2.14 (1.02, 4.45) 1.02 (1.00, 1.05)
Niger (2006) 1.21 (1.04, 1.40) 1.23 (0.93, 1.61) 7.20 (1.60, 32.48) 0.37 (0.12, 1.13) 0.98 (0.94, 1.02)
Nigeria (2008) 0.92 (0.84, 1.02) 1.01 (0.84, 1.20) 1.61 (0.78, 3.32) 1.06 (0.49, 2.30) 0.91 (0.84, 0.99)
Senegal (2005) 0.98 (0.86, 1.10) 1.04 (0.80, 1.34) 1.15 (0.46, 2.85) 2.06 (0.96, 4.44) 0.95 (0.91, 0.99)
Sierra Leone (2008) 0.95 (0.81, 1.11) 1.09 (0.79, 1.49) 1.94 (0.60, 6.32) 1.70 (0.62, 4.67) 1.08 (0.87, 1.34)

Values reported as adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)*†.

*

Models controlled for the following individual and household level factors: age, age at marriage, partner age difference, number of living children, death of a child, gender composition of children, religion, residence, wealth, employment, education (respondent and partner), violence index, decision-making autonomy index, HIV knowledge index, reproductive health knowledge index, media exposure index.

Bolded figures are signpone.0040670.g001.tifificant at 0.05 level.

**

Information on decision-making autonomy not collected in the 2005 Congo DHS – Women’s Questionnaire.