Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 18;7(7):e40670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040670

Table 6. Comparison of individual and household level model to community level model, sigma mu and likelihood ratio test p-value reported for 21 study countries.

Region and Country Individual Level Model Sigma Mu (SE)1 Community Level Model Sigma Mu (SE)1 Likelihood Ratio Test(p-value)2
Eastern Africa
Ethiopia (2005) 0.73 (0.06) 0.66 (0.06) <0.0001
Kenya (2008–09) 0.50 (0.06) 0.39 (0.06) <0.0001
Madagascar (2008–09) 0.70 (0.04) 0.60 (0.04) <0.0001
Rwanda (2005) 0.63 (0.09) 0.54 (0.09) 0.0003
Uganda (2006) 0.46 (0.07) 0.40 (0.07) <0.0001
Zambia (2007) 0.64 (0.06) 0.47 (0.06) <0.0001
Zimbabwe (2005–06) 0.47 (0.06) 0.38 (0.06) 0.0001
Middle Africa
Congo (2005) 0.17 (0.16) 0.003 (0.028) 0.4253
Democratic Republic of Congo (2007) 0.72 (0.08) 0.64 (0.08) 0.0081
Northern Africa
Egypt (2008) 0.59 (0.03) 0.45 (0.03) <0.0001
Southern Africa
Namibia (2006–07) 0.13 (0.18) 0.003 (0.022) 0.0001
Swaziland (2006–07) 0.003 (0.030) 0.002 (0.019) 0.2863
Western Africa
Benin (2006) 0.56 (0.07) 0.54 (0.07) 0.6813
Ghana (2008) 0.54 (0.10) 0.52 (0.11) 1.0000
Guinea (2005) 0.76 (0.10) 0.64 (0.10) 0.0062
Liberia (2007) 0.48 (0.10) 0.42 (0.11) 0.3057
Mali (2006) 0.42 (0.06) 0.36 (0.07) 0.0002
Niger (2006) 0.69 (0.09) 0.58 (0.09) 0.0001
Nigeria (2008) 0.72 (0.04) 0.58 (0.04) <0.0001
Senegal (2005) 0.61 (0.06) 0.47 (0.06) <0.0001
Sierra Leone (2008) 0.71 (0.11) 0.58 (0.11) 0.0027

1 Models where variables account for all the PSU level variation are bolded.

2 Two-tailed p-value was used.