Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 18;7(7):e40759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040759

Table 4. Comparison of characteristics for HTP and previous R&D strategies.

R&D Step Characteristics Previous strategy HTP strategy
Cloning Cloning type: Restriction site LIC
Number of constructs: 2–3 1–96
Number of researchers: 1 1
Timescale * (weeks): 2–3 2–3
Cost per TAA ∼ (£): 210 180
Expression Batch type: R&D HTPE
Number of conditions: 1 4“
Number of batches: 7 192
Number of researchers: 1 1
Timescale’ (weeks): 1 1
Cost per TAA ∼ (£): 40 6
Purification Batch type: R&D HTPE
Number of batches: 4 192
Number of researchers: 2 1
Timescale (weeks): 2 1
Cost per TAA ∼ (£): 130 20
Assay Assay type: R&D 5 point assay HTPA 2 point assay
Number of TAA tested: 7 21
Number of researchers: 4 4
Samples per day: 200 200
Cost per TAA ∼ (£): 108 36
*

Experimental timescale. Clonal verification by sequencing results and analysis may take longer or require additional man power. ∼ Approximation of consumable costs.

More flasks or different conditions may be required if yields are poor. “Over 90% of the constructs tested so far are expressed under the HTPE screen conditions. 48 different proteins, 4 batches of each.‘Protein batches large enough for HTPA of up to 400 samples.