Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 6;39(4):393–414. doi: 10.1007/s10928-012-9258-0

Table 7.

Values of the Akaike information criterion (AIC), Bayesian information criterion (BIC), and pharmacokinetic objective function value (OBV) for the final stepwise model and the single-objective, hybrid, genetic algorithm (SOHGA) candidate model with the lowest fitness function value

Compound Final stepwise model Final SOHGA model AICSOHGA − AICstepwise
Citalopram, IV BIC = 5,474.9 BIC = 5,457.8 −22.3
AIC = 5, 391.9 AIC = 5,369.6
OBV = 5,359.9 OBV = 5,335.6
DMAG, IV BIC = 9,942.3 BIC = 9,920.0 −22.3
AIC = 9,871.7 AIC = 9,849.4
OBV = 9,843.7 −OBV = 9,821.4
Escitalopram [21] BIC = 2,800.1 BIC = 2,783.4 −0.1
AIC = 2,737.7 AIC = 2,737.6
OBV = 2,707.1 OBV = 2,715.6
Olanzapine, oral [14] BIC = 10,413.8 BIC = 9,937.9 −470.5
AIC = 10,365.8 AIC = 9,895.3
OBV = 10,347.8 OBV = 9,879.3
Perphenazine, oral [15] BIC = 601.1 BIC = 604.4 −4.8
AIC = 560.7 AIC = 555.9
OBV = 540.7 OBV = 531.9
Risperidone, oral [16] BIC = 5,202.8 BIC = 4,934.9 −278.1
AIC = 5,131.1 AIC = 4,853.0
OBV = 5,103.1 OBV = 4,821.0
Ziprasidone, oral [17] BIC = 4,789.3 BIC = 4,784.8 −4.5
AIC = 4,763.2 AIC = 4,758.7
OBV = 4,751.2 OBV = 4,746.7