Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Neurosci. 2012 Jul;36(2):2213–2228. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08108.x

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Figure 3

Inhibition influences thalamic relay capability (schematic illustration). A. Baseline input conditions establish a rest potential and a threshold for action potential generation (top). If an excitatory input arrives, a successful relay response (i.e., spike generation) is determined by the strength of that input relative to the separation between rest potential and threshold (middle, bottom); a sufficiently input strength to yield relay is represented by a curly bracket. B. Parkinsonian conditions are characterized by oscillations in the inhibitory input to thalamus (from GPi). At the onset of strong inhibition, a formerly relay-inducing excitatory input fails to yield relay (top). If inhibition is sustained, T-current deinactivation can restore relay by raising rest potential and lowering threshold (middle). Since T- current inactivation is slow, the arrival of the same input after a relatively abrupt withdrawal of inhibition can yield an excessive response (bottom). One possibility is that DBS of STN pins the inhibitory input from GPi to thalamus at a high level, where relay is restored by T-current availability.