Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Jun 29;20(9):1902–1911. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0221

Table 1.

Summary of results for evaluation of multiplexed inflammation marker assays

Bio-Rad number of markers (%) Millipore number of markers (%)

Total 67 (100.0) 97 (100.0)

Markers with > 25% detection
 Serum 56 (83.5) 89 (91.7)
 Heparin plasma 63 (94.0) 89 (91.7)
 EDTA plasma 64 (95.5) 89 (91.7)

Markers with < 20% CV for across-batch duplicatesa
 Serum 51 (76.2) 75 (77.3)
 Heparin plasma 52 (77.6) 69 (71.1)
 EDTA plasma 47 (70.1) 78 (80.4)

ICCs for across-batch duplicates
Serum
  <0.50 6 (8.9) 5 (5.1)
  0.50–0.80 29 (43.3) 32 (33.0)
  0.80–0.90 12 (17.9) 19 (19.5)
  ≥0.90 11 (16.4) 34 (35.1)
Heparin plasma
  <0.50 3 (4.5) 9 (9.3)
  0.50–0.80 38 (56.7) 31 (31.9)
  0.80–0.90 15 (22.3) 25 (25.8)
  ≥0.90 7 (10.4) 28 (28.9)
EDTA plasma
  <0.50 5 (7.5) 7 (7.2)
  0.50–0.80 49 (73.1) 25 (25.8)
  0.80–0.90 5 (7.5) 24 (24.7)
  ≥0.90 5 (7.5) 37 (38.1)

Markers with acceptable performanceb 45 (67.2) 71 (73.2)

Abbreviations: CV= coefficient of variation; ICC=intraclass correlation coefficient.

a

CVs and ICCs were calculated for 20 blinded duplicate samples for each specimen type that were placed across different batches.

b

Acceptable performance was defined as: 1) being detectable in greater than 25% of the 100 samples on all three specimen types and 2) across-batch CVs of <20% for blinded duplicates placed on at least 2 of the three specimen types.