Skip to main content
letter
. 2012 Mar 8;6(8):1621–1624. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.8

Table 1. M2 and Monte Carlo P-values for all Procrustes comparisons.

  HiSeq lane 6, 5 HiSeq lane 6, 3 HiSeq lane 7, 5 HiSeq lane 7, 3 HiSeq lane 8, 5 HiSeq lane 8, 3 MiSeq, 5 MiSeq, 3
Procrustes M2
 HiSeq lane 6, 5′                
 HiSeq lane 6, 3′ 0.006              
 HiSeq lane 7, 5′ 0.000 0.006            
 HiSeq lane 7, 3′ 0.005 0.000 0.006          
 HiSeq lane 8, 5′ 0.000 0.006 0.000 0.005        
 HiSeq lane 8, 3′ 0.005 0.000 0.006 0.006 0.006      
 MiSeq, 5′ 0.006 0.009 0.006 0.008 0.007 0.008    
 MiSeq, 3′ 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.008 0.002
                 
P-value (based on 10 000 Monte Carlo iterations)
 HiSeq lane 6, 5′                
 HiSeq lane 6, 3′ 0.0000              
 HiSeq lane 7, 5′ 0.0000 0.0000            
 HiSeq lane 7, 3′ 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000          
 HiSeq lane 8, 5′ 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000        
 HiSeq lane 8, 3′ 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000      
 MiSeq, 5′ 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000    
 MiSeq, 3′ 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000