Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 19.

Published in final edited form as: Proc Meet Acoust. 2011 Oct;12:050005–050010. doi: 10.1121/1.3656342

Fig. 2 — Acoustical MTFs for the anechoic and reverberant room sound fields used for testing in this study. MTFs are displayed for both source orientations (0° and 90°) and for both left () and right () ears; the distance was 1.4 m. The curves represent MTFs computed from HRIRs / BRIRs and the symbols represent results of direct methods of MTF determination (see text for details). Predicted acoustical MTFs for the reverberant room are also displayed based on an algorithm described by Houtgast and Steeneken (1985) assuming exponentially decaying diffuse reverberation, with T₆₀ = 1.8 s.

Inline graphic — Acoustical MTFs for the anechoic and reverberant room sound fields used for testing in this study. MTFs are displayed for both source orientations (0° and 90°) and for both left () and right () ears; the distance was 1.4 m. The curves represent MTFs computed from HRIRs / BRIRs and the symbols represent results of direct methods of MTF determination (see text for details). Predicted acoustical MTFs for the reverberant room are also displayed based on an algorithm described by Houtgast and Steeneken (1985) assuming exponentially decaying diffuse reverberation, with T₆₀ = 1.8 s.