Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 19;7(7):e41293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041293

Table 1. Correlation between PLK4 expression and clinicopathologic parameters in HCC.

Variable PLK4 protein
All cases Low expression High expression x2 P valuea
Age(years)b 0.021 0.886
<48 120 63 (52.5%) 57 (47.5%)
≥48 126 65 (51.6%) 61 (48.4%)
Gender 0.151 0.698
Female 27 15(55.6%) 12(44.4%)
Male 219 113(51.6%) 106(48.4%)
HBsAg 0.729 0.393
Yes 212 108(50.9%) 104 (49.1%)
No 34 20(58.8%) 14 (41.2%)
AFP (ng/ml) 5.544 0.019
<20 104 45(43.3%) 59 (56.7%)
≥20 142 83 (58.5%) 59 (41.5%)
Liver cirrhosis 0.066 0.798
Yes 177 93 (52.5%) 84(47.5%)
No 69 35 (50.7%) 34 (49.3%)
Tumor size (cm) 4.603 0.032
<5 118 53 (44.9%) 65 (55.1%)
≥5 128 75 (58.6%) 53(41.4%)
Tumor multiplicity 0.363 0.547
Single 130 70 (53.8%) 60(46.2%)
Multiple 116 58 (50.0%) 58 (50.0%)
Differentiation 5.216 0.157
Well (I) 32 21(65.6%) 11 (34.4%)
Moderate (II) 104 48 (46.2%) 56 (53.8%)
Poor (III) 95 53 (55.8%) 42 (44.2%)
Undifferentiation (IV) 15 6 (40.0%) 9(60.0%)
Stage 8.665 0.034
I 22 6 (27.3%) 16 (72.7%)
II 109 55 (50.5%) 54 (49.5%)
III 87 48 (55.2%) 39 (44.8%)
IV 28 19 (67.9%) 9 (32.1%)
Vascular invasion 0.661 0.416
Yes 140 76(54.3%) 64(45.7%)
No 106 52(49.1%) 54 (50.9%)
a

Chi-square test;

b

patients were divided according to the median age; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; PLK4, polo-like kinase 4.