Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 19;7(7):e41487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041487

Table 1. Comparison of models used to test the effect of host species, climate and disturbance on fly abundance in four species of bats in the Smithsonian Venezuela Project data set.

Model ranks Model structure K R2 AIC Δ AIC w i
1a Host*PC1 + Host*PC2 + Host*HPE 21 0.25 17180 0 99.96
2 Host*PC1 + Host*PC2 17 0.247 17196 16 0.04
3 Host*PC2 13 0.229 17328 148 0
4 Host*PC1 13 0.225 17356 176 0
5 Host*HPE 13 0.222 17378 198 0
6b Host 9 0.211 17451 271 0
7 PC1 + PC2 8 0.079 18337 1157 0
8 PC1 7 0.077 18349 1169 0
9 PC2 7 0.063 18435 1255 0
10 HPE 7 0.06 18453 1273 0
11c 1 3 0 18806 1626 0

Models are ranked from the most supported (best model) to the least supported according to Akaike information criteria (AIC). Δ AIC – difference in AIC between the current and best model; w i – model probabilities. K – number of parameters in the model. Note that the number of parameters includes k, which is the dispersion parameter of the negative binomial distribution (see Protocol S1 for details). Host – host species; PC1 and PC2 – principal components of the seven environmental variables; HPE – Human population density estimate (see Methods for details).

a

Global model; b host-species model; c Null model.