Table 1. Performance of EdaFold and Rosetta.
EdaFold | Rosetta | ||||||||
avg CARMSD (Å ) | avg e- CARMSD (Å ) | avg CARMSD (Å ) | avg e- CARMSD (Å ) | ||||||
Target | Length | top 1 | top 1% | top 1 | top 1% | top 1 | top 1% | top 1 | top 1% |
1bq9 | 54 | 1.98 | 2.97 | 9.13 | 8.87 | 3.53 | 4.63 | 9.00 | 7.83 |
1di2 | 69 | 1.35 | 1.57 | 4.23 | 4.75 | 1.51 | 1.91 | 4.17 | 4.07 |
1scjB | 71 | 2.66 | 3.05 | 3.08 | 3.06 | 3.62 | 4.22 | 4.60 | 4.42 |
1hz5 | 72 | 2.28 | 2.6 | 3.95 | 4.06 | 2.23 | 2.49 | 3.88 | 3.80 |
1cc8 | 73 | 2.69 | 3.3 | 6.80 | 6.42 | 2.71 | 3.22 | 5.05 | 3.60 |
1ctf | 74 | 3.19 | 3.94 | 7.09 | 7.05 | 3.1 | 3.73 | 8.37 | 7.92 |
1ig5 | 75 | 2.34 | 2.75 | 4.55 | 4.16 | 2.34 | 2.72 | 5.03 | 4.30 |
1dtj | 76 | 2.73 | 3.66 | 6.82 | 5.85 | 2.73 | 3.7 | 6.29 | 3.58 |
1ogw | 76 | 2.64 | 3.07 | 4.66 | 4.66 | 2.89 | 3.29 | 4.70 | 4.61 |
1dcj | 81 | 2.76 | 3.41 | 5.18 | 5.00 | 2.91 | 3.52 | 5.99 | 5.06 |
2ci2 | 83 | 3.23 | 4.72 | 8.10 | 8.12 | 3.16 | 4.17 | 9.15 | 9.95 |
3nzl | 83 | 3.74 | 4.14 | 5.26 | 5.27 | 3.94 | 4.49 | 7.33 | 7.75 |
1a19 | 90 | 3.18 | 3.76 | 5.55 | 4.44 | 3.46 | 4.37 | 8.62 | 8.52 |
1tig | 94 | 3.4 | 3.83 | 4.96 | 4.52 | 3.33 | 3.95 | 4.75 | 4.13 |
1bm8 | 99 | 3.67 | 4.36 | 8.89 | 6.71 | 3.65 | 4.57 | 8.82 | 8.73 |
4ubpA | 101 | 4.13 | 4.87 | 11.24 | 12.50 | 3.85 | 4.63 | 9.87 | 8.51 |
1iib | 106 | 3.29 | 4.42 | 9.41 | 9.72 | 3.28 | 4.7 | 10.44 | 11.28 |
1m6t | 106 | 1.67 | 2.01 | 3.56 | 4.82 | 1.94 | 2.34 | 3.98 | 3.51 |
1acf | 125 | 3.96 | 4.68 | 10.40 | 8.54 | 4.75 | 5.92 | 10.34 | 12.17 |
3chy | 128 | 3.52 | 4.51 | 6.99 | 4.87 | 3.88 | 4.93 | 7.81 | 5.90 |
Avg. | 2.92 | 3.58 | 6.49 | 6.17 | 3.14 | 3.88 | 6.90 | 6.48 |
avg CARMSD is the average CARMSD of the nearest to native decoys. avg e- CARMSD is the average CARMSD of the lowest Rosetta energy decoys. Results differences which are statistically significant with more than confidence according to Mann-Whitney U test are in bold.