Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 4;8(3):455–461. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2012.29220

Table II.

Diagnostic performance of CTCA in detecting significant stenosis

Parameter LM (n=24) LAD (n=21) LCx (n=17) All segments (n=62) All patients (n=24)
Sensitivity (95% CI) 100% (29.2–100) 100% (15.8–100) 75% (19.4–99.4) 89% (51.8–99.7) 86% (42.1–99.6)
Specificity (95% CI) 74% (52.8–91.8) 68% (43.5–87.4) 54% (25.1–80.8) 68% (53.7–80.1) 41% (18.4–67.1)
Positive predictive value (95% CI) 38% (8.5–75.5) 25% (3.2–65.1) 33% (7.5–70.1) 32% (14.9–53.5) 38% (15.2–64.6)
Negative predictive value (95% CI) 100% (79.4–100) 100% (75.3–100) 88% (47.4–99.7) 97% (85.8–99.9) 88% (47.4–99.7)
Accuracy (95% CI) 79% (62.7–95.3) 71% (50.5–91.5) 59% (35.6–82.4) 71% (59.7–82.3) 54% (34.1–73.9)
Likelihood ratio 4.2 3.2 1.6 2.8 1.5
Cut-off value [mm2] <6.19 <4.78 <4.97 <5.29
SE 46% SE 67% SE 75% SE 64%
SP 88% SP 90% SP 65% SP 77%
Area under curve 0.6788 0.8204 0.7243 0.7293

SE – sensitivity, SP – specificity