Summary of evidence that AvrB elicits an Rpg1-dependent
HR whether delivered by P. syringae pv glycinea,
P. fluorescens (pHIR11), or biolistic transformation.
Top indicates the responses of soybean cultivars Acme
and Harosoy to P. syringae pv glycinea and P.
fluorescens (pHIR11) strains with or without
avrB (33, 86). “P” indicates pathogenicity
(bacterial blight symptoms); “HR” indicates rapid confluent
collapse with an inoculum level of 5 × 107 cells/ml
and no disease development at any inoculum level; “Null”
indicates no visible response. Bottom shows the effects
on β-glucuronidase (GUS) activity of transient coexpression of
avrB in leaf cells of Acme and Harosoy. The leaves were
biolistically cobombarded with tungsten particles coated with the
indicated plasmids, incubated for 24 h, and then histochemically
stained for GUS activity (23), which is an indicator of the viability
of the transformed cells (87). Note that the histochemically stained
spots are much smaller in the Acme leaves expressing
avrB and completely absent in Harosoy leaves expressing
avrB.