Table 4. Prevalence and adjusted odds ratios or coefficients from multiple variable regression models for associations between having had a relationship or sex predicated on their material provision, sex with a woman in prostitution or both of these or neither and psychological measures.* .
Gender equitable men scale | Rape myth scale | Hostility towards women scale | ||||||||||
mean | Coef | 95% CI | p value | mean | Coef | 95% CI | p value | mean | Coef | 95% CI | p value | |
Relationship or sex predicated on men providing (n = 839) | 23.00 | ref | 9.71 | ref | 4.48 | ref | ||||||
Sex with a woman in prostitution (n = 51) | 23.20 | −0.44 | −2.08, 1.21 | 0.60 | 9.21 | 0.39 | −0.53, 1.31 | 0.41 | 3.80 | −0.10 | −1.09, 0.90 | 0.85 |
Both (n = 245) | 22.45 | −0.99 | −1.80, −0.17 | 0.02 | 9.89 | 0.59 | 0.14, 1.04 | 0.01 | 4.34 | 0.49 | −0.01, 0.98 | 0.06 |
Neither (n = 510) | 24.49 | 1.40 | 0.75, 2.04 | <0.0001 | 9.12 | −0.59 | −0.94,−0.24 | <0.0001 | 3.31 | −1.14 | −1.54, −0.75 | <0.0001 |
Psychopathy: blame externalisation | Empathy | Psychopathy: Machiavellian egocentricity | ||||||||||
% | aOR | 95% CI | p value | mean | Coef | 95% CI | p value | % | aOR | 95% CI | p value | |
Relationship or sex predicated on men providing (n = 839) | 40.6 | ref | 13.36 | ref | 20.0 | ref | ||||||
Sex with a woman in prostitution (n = 51) | 39.6 | 1.03 | 0.54, 1.97 | 0.92 | 15.78 | 1.25 | −0.46,3.97 | 0.15 | 14.6 | 0.92 | 0.39, 2.19 | 0.858 |
Both (n = 245) | 51.1 | 1.50 | 1.08, 2.07 | 0.014 | 13.61 | −0.32 | −1.15, 0.52 | 0.46 | 30.2 | 2.31 | 1.59, 3.34 | <0.0001 |
Neither (n = 510) | 22.8 | 0.41 | 0.31, 0.54 | <0.0001 | 14.94 | 1.91 | 1.26, 2.56 | <0.0001 | 10.6 | 0.46 | 0.32, 0.67 | <0.0001 |
each was modelled separately using multiple regression and each model adjusted for age, race, education, income, marital status, stratum.