Table 2. ANCOVA Analysis for depression symptoms at baseline and at 3 months follow up (n=400).
Measure | Comparison of Means between Intervention and Control Groups (n=400) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Intervention | Control | ||||||
|
|||||||
(n=218) | (n=182) | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F | P | |
Baseline | |||||||
Mean ± SD | 23.3 ± 11.78 | 21.8 ± 11.06 | |||||
Estimated mean | 22.5 | 22.4 | |||||
Model* | 3.64 | 1 | 3.64 | .05 | .83 | ||
| |||||||
3 Months Follow up | |||||||
Mean ± SD | 21.9 ± 10.43 | 22.3 ± 11.76 | |||||
Estimated mean | 21 | 23 | |||||
Model** | 368.05 | 1 | 368.05 | 3.85 | .05 |
Note: ANCOVA analysis for depression symptoms included the following variables as covariates: age, years of education, religiosity, per capita income, self-esteem and presence of machismo.
At baseline, self-esteem and presence of machismo were significantly related to depression symptoms (F(1, 392) = 154.32, p < .01 and (F(1, 392) = 26.12, p < .01) respectively).
At 3 months follow up, the covariates years of education (F(1, 392) = 12.8, p < .01), self-esteem (F(1, 392) = 45.52, p < .01) and machismo (F(1, 392) = 15.26, p < .01) were significantly related to depression symptoms.