Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2012 Mar 27;20(3):263–272. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2012.01907.x

Table 2. ANCOVA Analysis for depression symptoms at baseline and at 3 months follow up (n=400).

Measure Comparison of Means between Intervention and Control Groups
(n=400)

Intervention Control

(n=218) (n=182) Sum of Squares df Mean Square F P
Baseline
 Mean ± SD 23.3 ± 11.78 21.8 ± 11.06
 Estimated mean 22.5 22.4
 Model* 3.64 1 3.64 .05 .83

3 Months Follow up
 Mean ± SD 21.9 ± 10.43 22.3 ± 11.76
 Estimated mean 21 23
 Model** 368.05 1 368.05 3.85 .05

Note: ANCOVA analysis for depression symptoms included the following variables as covariates: age, years of education, religiosity, per capita income, self-esteem and presence of machismo.

*

At baseline, self-esteem and presence of machismo were significantly related to depression symptoms (F(1, 392) = 154.32, p < .01 and (F(1, 392) = 26.12, p < .01) respectively).

**

At 3 months follow up, the covariates years of education (F(1, 392) = 12.8, p < .01), self-esteem (F(1, 392) = 45.52, p < .01) and machismo (F(1, 392) = 15.26, p < .01) were significantly related to depression symptoms.