Table 2.
Logistic regressions of dichotomous income component measures on type and number of early-onset mental disorders among WMH respondents who were are 18-64 years old at the time of interview1
| Disabled | Employed | Married | Spouse employed among the married |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
|
|
||||
| I. Mental disorders2 | ||||
| Mood disorders | ||||
| Major depression or dysthymia | 2.0* (1.7-2.3) | 0.9 (0.8-1.0) | 0.7* (0.6-0.8) | 1.1 (0.9-1.3) |
| Broad spectrum bipolar disorder | 2.5* (1.8-3.5) | 0.7* (0.5-0.9) | 0.7* (0.5-0.9) | 0.8 (0.5-1.4) |
| Anxiety disorders | ||||
| Panic disorder | 1.5* (1.1-2.0) | 0.7* (0.6-1.0) | 0.8 (0.6-1.1) | 1.0 (0.6-1.6) |
| Generalized anxiety disorder | 1.9* (1.4-2.4) | 0.6* (0.5-0.8) | 0.9 (0.7-1.2) | 1.0 (0.7-1.6) |
| Social phobia | 1.4* (1.2-1.7) | 0.9* (0.8-1.0) | 0.8* (0.7-1.0) | 1.3* (1.1-1.6) |
| Specific phobia | 1.6* (1.4-1.8) | 0.9* (0.8-1.0) | 0.9 (0.8-1.1) | 1.1 (1.0-1.3) |
| Agoraphobia without panic | 2.1* (1.5-3.0) | 0.7 (0.5-1.0) | 0.6* (0.5-0.9) | 0.6 (0.4-1.0) |
| Post-traumatic stress disorder | 2.0* (1.6-2.5) | 0.8 (0.7-1.1) | 1.0 (0.8-1.4) | 0.8 (0.6-1.2) |
| Separation anxiety disorder | 1.3* (1.0-1.6) | 1.0 (0.8-1.1) | 1.0 (0.8-1.1) | 1.0 (0.8-1.4) |
| Disruptive behavior disorders | ||||
| Oppositional-defiant disorder | 1.1 (0.7-1.5) | 0.9 (0.7-1.2) | 1.0 (0.8-1.2) | 1.4 (0.9-2.0) |
| Conduct disorder | 1.7* (1.1-2.6) | 0.8 (0.6-1.1) | 1.2 (0.9-1.5) | 1.1 (0.8-1.7) |
| Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder | 1.9* (1.2-3.0) | 1.3 (1.0-1.7) | 1.1 (0.9-1.3) | 1.0 (0.7-1.5) |
| Intermittent explosive disorder | 1.0 (0.8-1.3) | 1.0 (0.8-1.3) | 1.3* (1.1-1.5) | 1.3 (1.0-1.7) |
| Substance disorders | ||||
| Alcohol abuse3 | 1.0 (0.8-1.3) | 0.8* (0.6-1.0) | 0.8 (0.7-1.0) | 1.5* (1.1-2.0) |
| Alcohol abuse with dependence | 1.6* (1.1-2.3) | 0.7 (0.4-1.1) | 0.8 (0.6-1.2) | 0.6* (0.4-0.9) |
| Drug abuse3 | 1.2 (0.9-1.7) | 0.9 (0.7-1.3) | 1.0 (0.7-1.2) | 1.1 (0.7-1.5) |
| Drug abuse with dependence | 0.8 (0.5-1.4) | 1.6 (0.9-2.8) | 0.9 (0.6-1.4) | 1.0 (0.5-2.2) |
| χ 2 17 4 | 558.6* | 102.0* | 103.2* | 30.0* |
| χ 2 16 5 | 87.1* | 34.3* | 58.7* | 30.4* |
| II. Number of disorders 2 | ||||
| Exactly 1 disorder | 2.1* (1.9-2.4) | 0.8* (0.8-0.9) | 0.9* (0.8-1.0) | 1.1 (1.0-1.3) |
| Exactly 2 disorders | 3.1* (2.6-3.7) | 0.7* (0.6-0.8) | 0.8* (0.7-0.9) | 1.3* (1.1-1.6) |
| Exactly 3 disorders | 4.4* (3.5-5.5) | 0.7* (0.5-0.9) | 0.7* (0.6-0.9) | 1.4 (1.0-1.8) |
| Exactly 4 disorders | 5.9* (4.5-7.8) | 0.5* (0.4-0.7) | 0.6* (0.5-0.8) | 1.5 (0.9-2.4) |
| 5+ disorders | 7.1* (5.5-9.2) | 0.5* (0.4-0.6) | 0.7* (0.5-0.8) | 1.5 (1.0-2.2) |
| χ 2 5 4 | 466.4* | 74.5* | 32.9* | 16.0* |
| (n) | (44,527) | (37,741) | (37,741) | (26,103) |
Significant at the 0.05 level, two-sided test
Based on a multiple logistic regression model with controls for country, sex, level of education, and time since completing education estimated in all countries. Unlike the analyses in Table 1, New Zealand and Ukraine were included in the analyses reported in this table. This accounts for the larger total sample size here (n = 44,527) than in Table 1 (n = 37,741).
The results in Parts I and II are for two different models. The first model has a separate dummy predictor variable for each mental disorder assessed in the surveys. The second model includes a set of dummy predictor variables for the number of disorders the respondent had without distinguishing types of disorders. We also investigated models that included predictors for both type and number of disorders as well as models that included interactions between type and number of disorders, but the less complex models shown here out-performed those other models.
With or without dependence
Joint significance of the coefficients associated with the disorders assessed in the model
Significance of differences among the coefficients associated with the disorders assessed in the model