Appendix 18. Sensitivity analysis taking into account risk of bias (‘incomplete outcome data’).
Outcome | Sensitivity analysis on incomplete outcome data |
Result |
---|---|---|
1.1.4 TC | Exclude studies biased on incomplete outcome data (Ding 1999; Li 2006; Qi 2004) |
MD 0.17 (95% CI −0.29 to 0.62) I2 = 91% |
1.1.3 TC | Exclude study biased on incomplete outcome data (Xu 2000) |
MD −0.03 (95% CI −0.22 to 0.15) I2 = 0% |
1.1.5 TC | Exclude study biased on incomplete outcome data (Feng 2006) |
MD −0.94 (95% CI −1.22 to −0.66) I2 = not applicable |
1.1.7 TC | Exclude study biased on incomplete outcome data (Wang 2006) |
MD −0.02 (95% CI −0.44 to 0.40) I2 = not applicable |
1.2.4 TG | Exclude studies biased on incomplete outcome data (Li 2006; Qi 2004) |
MD −0.08 (95% CI −0.21 to 0.05) I2 = 62% |
1.2.3 TG | Exclude study biased on incomplete outcome data (Xu 2000) |
MD −0.06 (95% CI −0.17 to 0.06) I2 = 93% |
1.2.5 TG | Exclude study biased on incomplete outcome data (Feng 2006) |
MD 0.08 (95% CI −0.19 to 0.35) I2 = not applicable |
1.3.4 HDL-C | Exclude studies biased on incomplete outcome data (Ding 1999; Qi 2004) |
MD 0.08 (95% CI −0.03 to 0.19) I2 = 86% |
1.3.3 HDL-C | Exclude study biased on incomplete outcome data (Xu 2000) |
MD 0.03 (95% CI −0.09 to 0.15) I2 = 57% |
1.3.5 HDL-C | Exclude study biased on incomplete outcome data (Feng 2006) |
MD 0.24 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.47) I2 = not applicable |
1.4.4 LDL-C | Exclude studies biased on incomplete outcome data (Ding 1999; Li 2006; Qi 2004) |
MD 0.04 (95% CI −0.28 to 0.35) I2 = 88% |
1.4.3 LDL-C | Exclude study biased on incomplete outcome data (Xu 2000) |
MD −0.18 (95% CI −0.33 to −0.03) I2 = 0% |
1.4.5 LDL-C | Exclude study biased on incomplete outcome data (Feng 2006) |
MD −0.38 (95% CI −0.72 to −0.04) I2 = not applicable |
1.14.1(TC-HDL-C)/HDL-C | Exclude study biased on incomplete outcome data (Li 2006) |
MD 0.14 (95% CI −0.26 to 0.54) I2 = not applicable |