Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 15;21(1):41–51. doi: 10.1002/mpr.357

Table 1.

Concordance of CIDI/DSM‐IV GAD symptoms with K‐SADS ratings in the NCS‐A clinical reappraisal sample (n = 347)

Prevalence Concordancea
K‐SADS CIDI SN SP PPV NPV Kappa AUC
Percent (SE) Percent (SE) χ 2 Est (SE) Est (SE) Est (SE) Est (SE) Est
Criterion A: Excessive worry 9.0 (1.7) 3.7 (0.9) 13.3* 25.2 (7.4) 98.4 (0.7) 61.2 (12.8) 93.0 (1.6) 0.32 0.62
Criterion B: Trouble controlling worry 8.6 (1.6) 28.1 (2.7) 53.0* 63.1 (9.8) 75.2 (2.8) 19.3 (4.0) 95.6 (1.5) 0.19 0.69
Criterion C: Physical symptoms 8.9 (1.6) 17.7 (2.2) 16.8* 53.2 (9.2) 85.8 (2.2) 26.9 (5.6) 94.9 (1.4) 0.27 0.70
Criterion D: Focus not other Axis I disorder 13.2 (2.0) 59.7 (3.2) 145.7* 84.1 (6.7) 44.0 (3.4) 18.6 (2.9) 94.8 (2.4) 0.11 0.64
Criterion E: Impairment 10.6 (1.8) 25.2 (2.5) 28.5* 60.4 (9.1) 78.9 (2.6) 25.3 (4.5) 94.4 (1.8) 0.24 0.70
Criterion F: Not due to substance 14.2 (2.1) 13.1 (2.0) 0.2 29.5 (6.5) 89.6 (2.0) 32.1 (6.9) 88.5 (2.2) 0.20 0.60
Overall diagnosis: (A, B, C, D, E, F) 3.3 (1.0) 2.4 (0.8) 1.2 57.2 (13.9) 99.5 (0.3) 78.8 (12.6) 98.6 (0.6) 0.65 0.78
a

SN, sensitivity; SP, specificity; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; Kappa, Cohen's Kappa; AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

*

The prevalence estimate based on the CIDI differs significantly from the estimate based on the K‐SADS at 0.05 level, two‐sided test.