Table 2. The number of unique lizards captured in 2009 and 2010.
| 2009 | 2010 | Combined (2009–2010) | ||||
| Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | |
| Number of lizards marked | 35 | 41 | 35 | 61 | 70 | 102 |
| Number of lizards resighted | 28 | 32 | 33 | 49 | 61 | 81 |
| Mark-recapture rate | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.94 | 0.80 | 0.87 | 0.79 |
| Lizards captured: 2009 and 2010 | - | - | 10 | 11 | 10 | 11 |
| Number of residents | 25 | 24 | 28 | 38 | 53 | 62 |
| Proportion of residents | 0.89 | 0.72 | 0.85 | 0.73 | 0.87 | 0.77 |
| Number of sightings | 7.20±0.78 | 7.58±0.65 | 8.18±0.81 | 5.66±0.38 | 6.88±0.49 | 6.46±0.40 |
| (25) | (24) | (28) | (38) | (53) | (62) | |
| Home range area (m2) | 48.60±14.60 | 30.20±10.9 | 38.20±11.70 | 14.56±5.58 | 43.75±9.29 | 32.01±8.79 |
| (8) | (10) | (7) | (9) | (15) | (19) | |
| Maximum distance moved (m) | 11.99±4.09 | 10.61±2.39 | 15.54±4.86 | 5.25±1.70 | 13.76±3.09 | 8.41±1.66 |
| (7) | (10) | (7) | (7) | (14) | (17) | |
| Number of burrows occupied | - | - | 1.41±0.11 | 1.29±0.07 | 1.30±0.13 | 1.30±0.09 |
| (29) | (38) | (20) | (30) | |||
We scored lizards as residents if they used the same burrow for 10 or more days (see text). Summary statistics (means ±1SE) are reported for the spatial data. Sample sizes are indicated in parentheses. Home range area was estimated using the minimum convex polygon.