Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 12;7(1):85–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2012.00358.x

Table 4.

 RT‐PCR analysis of oral swabs from ruddy turnstones experimentally inoculated with influenza isolate A/northern pintail/California/44242‐758/2006 (H5N2)

Bird ID Dose* DPI 0 DPI 1 DPI 2 DPI 3 DPI 4 DPI 5 DPI 6 DPI 7 DPI 9
 5 Control –**
70 Control
 7 2
 9 2 38·09***
11 2
16 2
20 2 39·51*** c c
51 2 38·23***
52 4
59 4
53 4 37·6 37·85 32·46 c
54 4
67 4 30·1 30·08 34·18c
66 4 33·85 33·99 37·82
57 6 39·79 37·56
58 6 34·95 37·21 36·26 34·64 38·24
60 6 33·85 35·2 38·63
62 6 37·11 35·4 32·55 38·93 39·7
 4 6 30·89c 32·1 35·54
69 6 30·8c 36·64

DPI, days post‐inoculation.

*Inocula doses expressed as Log10 EID50/100 μl. No bird inoculated with lower viral titers became infected based on viral excretion and seroconversion (not shown).

**C t values are from RT‐PCR analyses using avian influenza H5 specific primers and probe. Samples with no C t values are shown with –. cIndicates that RT‐PCR positive cloacal swabs were detected on the DPI shown.

***The presence of viral RNA detected on DPI1 only was assumed to be residual inoculum.

Presence of viable virus confirmed by virus isolation in embryonating egg culture.