Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Apr 16;80(5):907–916. doi: 10.1037/a0028016

Table 3.

Effect sizes (d) and significance levels for by the time x condition interactions in repeated measures ANOVA models comparing the conditions

Pre to post Thin-ideal internalization Body dissatisfaction Dieting Negative affect Eating disorder symptoms M effect sizes
eBody Project vs. brochure control 0.63 (p=.07) 1.32 (p=.000) 0.69 (p=.04) 0.72 (p=.04) 0.39 (p=.25) 0.75
Body Project vs. brochure control 0.67 (p=.01) 1.25 (p<.001) 0.60 (p=.03) 0.51 (p=.06) 0.57 (p=.04) 0.72
eBody Project vs. video control 0.51 (p= .09) 0.55 (p=.07) 0.63 (p=.04) 0.46 (p=.13) 0.22 (p=.47) 0.47
Body Project vs. video control 0.54 (p=.03) 0.72 (p=.005) 0.54 (p=.03) 0.42 (p=.096) 0.49 (p=.05) 0.54
eBody Project vs. Body Project -0.06 (p=.85) -0.19 (p=.47) -0.01 (p=.87) -0.06 (p=.87) -0.31 (p=.25) -0.13
Video vs. brochure controls 0.20 (p=.49) 0.46 (p=.12) 0.17 (p=.57) 0.14 (p=.64) 0.29 (p=.33) 0.25