Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2012 Aug;16(6):1472–1481. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-0079-8

Table 3.

Variables describing risk reducing symbiotic processes and prevention tactics in risk situations: Intercorrelations between scales, subscales, and single-item measures

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Risk reducing symbiotic processes
1 Keeping It r 1
Together scale P
2 Withdrawal r .419 1
Prevention scale P .010*
3 Homeless r .287 .417 1
Safety Tactics scale P .268 .074
4 Embedding r .160 .378 .555 1
Safety within Network scale P .438 .021* .010*
5 Access to r –.032 .341 .290 .415 1
Resources scale P .895 .062 .268 .016*
6 Relatives r .098 .304 .176 .117 .721 1
Support subscale P .646 .074 .514 .550 .000***
7 Drug Users r –.101 .276 .358 .500 .809 .299 1
Support subscale P .646 .105 .123 .001** .000*** .081
8 Program r –.135 .088 .044 .192 .579 .167 .335 1
Staff Support subscale P .514 .665 .895 .315 .000*** .418 .064
9 Reducing r .171 .479 .378 .441 .214 .127 .200 .079 1
drug intake on one's own P .397 .002** .105 .006** .268 .514 .268 .704
10 Storing r .250 .315 .433 .329 .118 –.056 .185 .134 .214 1
sealed syringes P .169 .065 .065 .062 .555 .764 .315 .514 .232
Prevention tactics in risk situations
11 Making sure r .130 .141 .560 .445 .454 .362 .455 .195 –.154 –.022 1
partner has clean works P .704 .665 .080 .105 .097 .210 .097 .549 .646 .975
12 Keeping own r .396 .411 .311 .162 .078 –.005 .119 .022 .211 .196 .051 1
personal injection space P .021* .010* .232 .428 .704 .976 .550 .936 .268 .300 .895
13 Injecting r .145 .004 –.426 –.029 .062 .131 –.068 .074 –.087 –.199 .018 .274 1
alone P .493 .976 .065 .895 .751 .514 .719 .704 .663 .268 .976 .123
14 Others asked r .005 .270 .411 .468 .188 –.090 .386 .065 .230 .246 –.125 .076 –.132 1
to use your syringes P .976 .112 .074 .004** .329 .657 .016* .734 .194 .158 .704 .704 .514
15 Had drugs r .068 .142 .130 .267 .122 –.008 .225 –.006 .130 .131 .075 –.154 –.244 .388
but no sterile syringes P .726 .482 .646 .123 .550 .976 .210 .976 . 514 .514 .823 .460 .159 .016*

r correlation coefficient; P adjusted P-values using Benjamini & Hochberg [13] false discovery rate correction

P < .1;

*

P < .05;

**

P < .01;

***

P < .001