Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul;166(6):1860–1871. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.01913.x

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effects of the R(−) and S(+) enantiomers of NαMe-αClMeHA on specific [125I]IPX binding (A) and forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation (B) in CHO(rH3(445)R) and CHO(rH3(413)R) cells expressing 500 fmol·mg−1 protein of receptor. Each point represents the mean ± SEM of values from two to three different experiments with three to five determinations each. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, significantly different from S(+) NαMe-αClMeHA.