Assess organizational capacity |
Interventions are more likely to succeed if the organization as a whole is ready for change. |
Assess institutional resources (e.g. trained staff, materials, technology platforms) and match them with the needs of the intervention. |
Organizations are equipped to implement and sustain the intervention. |
Ensure ongoing financial support. |
Foster a culture of equity |
Success is more likely if staff recognize that disparities exist within the organization and view inequality as an injustice that must be redressed. |
Institute systems to offer feedback to providers and incentivize disparities reduction. |
Staff shares a definition of equitable care and places high value on its delivery. |
Explicitly define equitable health care as a goal in mission statements. |
Build a work force that reflects the diversity of the patient population. |
Appoint staff to disparities reductions initiatives |
A plan to improve equity requires human resources. |
Consider quality improvement specialists and on-site equity champions to fill these roles. Mainstream equity into all quality improvement efforts. |
Intervention is given adequate time and effort. |
Anticipate leadership and staff turn-over: e.g. cross-train staff; incorporate intervention training into staff orientation; include program responsibilities in job descriptions. |
Staff is not overtaxed. |
Identify and appeal to the equity rationale that is most important to your audience |
Staff members are motivated for a variety of reasons: |
Leverage staff motivation to support the program: |
Buy-in across the organization is secured. |
Leadership may respond well to programs that guarantee a positive return on investment and leverage existing resources. |
Present data that demonstrate potential for positive financial impact. |
Consistent and accurate uptake of interventions is encouraged. |
Providers are often concerned with maximizing efficiency during the office visit. |
Enhance the care team and promote care management outside of the clinic. |
|
Front-line staff may be wary of impacting patient flow and room availability. |
Minimize burden and show respect for staff time. |
|
Everyone cares about patient outcomes. |
Inspire enthusiasm to help patients. |
|
Incorporate disparities interventions into existing systems and anticipate ripple effects |
New programs may create redundant efforts or conflicting goals with existing quality improvement initiatives. |
Assess existing systems (e.g., electronic medical records) and identify opportunities for integration during the planning phase. |
Workload and schedules are manageable. |
Disruptions and inconsistencies are minimized. |
Involve members of the target population during program planning |
Programs that are not culturally targeted risk rejection by patients. |
Involve the target population in program design in a manner that is meaningful and inclusive. |
Community engagement is advanced. |
Input by minority health workers is not a proxy for patient involvement. |
Engage patients, not just minority health workers. |
Programs are relevant and effective. |
Strike a balance between adherence and adaptability |
While adherence to protocol ensures consistency, flexibility is key when working with diverse patients. |
Regularly collect process measures, identify opportunities for improvement, and adapt the intervention accordingly. |
Programs are consistent, yet flexible. |
Use standardized checklists to monitor adherence. |
Be realistic about the time necessary to move the dial on disparities |
Improvements in minority health take time because of multiple challenges inside and outside the clinic. |
Plan long-term follow-up to demonstrate statistically significant improvements in health outcomes. |
A realistic timeline manages expectations and maintains ongoing support. |