Table 3.
Response differences between ipsilateral and contralateral inputs in NH and UHL.
| Region | X,Y,Z | UHL |
NH |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RE stimulation |
LE stimulation |
RE stimulation |
LE stimulation |
||||||
| F a | Pr>F | F | Pr>F | F | Pr>F | F | Pr>F | ||
| Te1.0 | −47.5,−26,8 47,−23,11 |
4.96 | .03 | 7.54 | .007 | 140.8 | <.0001 | 3.14 | .08 |
| Te1.1 | −41,−32,9 37,−29,14 |
42.8 | <.0001 | 26.9 | <.0001 | 64.7 | <.0001 | 4.2 | .04 |
| Te2 | −45,−35.5,9 53,−22,9 |
.55 | .46 | 117.5 | <.0001 | 7.7 | .006 | 122.6 | <.0001 |
| Te3 | −60,−22,−1 63,−18,5 |
41.1 | <.0001 | 76.3 | <.0001 | 30.9 | <.0001 | 142.8 | <.0001 |
| STG/STS | −60,−46,13 56,−38,9 |
2.3 | 0.13 | 5.38 | 0.02 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 9.68 | 0.002 |
a
NH F ratio df 1/11 and for UHL df 1/12.